Legal Opinion

Inland Steel Co. v. Kiessling

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1910No. 21,280PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Lake Superior Court; Virgil S. Reiter, Judge. Action by Alfred Kiessling against the Inland Steel Company. From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $6,000, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, C. J.

Appellee brought this action against appellant to recover damages for injuries received by him while in the service of appellant. Appellant’s demurrer to the complaint for want of facts was overruled. The jury returned, with the general verdict, answers to interrogatories submitted by the court. Over appellant’s motion for a new trial and a motion for judgment in its favor on the answers *631to the interrogatories, notwithstanding the general verdict, the court rendered a judgment on the general verdict in favor of appellee.

1. It is first insisted that the court erred in overruling the demurrer…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Shoner v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. McKee v. TourtellotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. McCoy v. Kokomo Railway & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Toomey v. Eureka Iron & Steer WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Epperson v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Childress v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. v. WalshIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Richards v. RichardsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Inland Steel Co. v. KiesslingIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Isaacs v. Fletcher American National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API