Legal Opinion

Mariano v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 2006No. GDCA-T-05-500Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON APPEAL

WILSON, Judge.

The plaintiff initiated this civil action to recover damages for personal injuries he sustained in a fall at the Mohegan Sun Casino, a gaming facility operated by the Defendant. From a judgment in favor of the defendant, the Plaintiff appealed to this Court. We affirm.

I

The background and the findings of fact as reported in the decision of the trial *494court (Mariano v. MTGA, 2 G.D.R. 130, 6 Am. Tribal Law 541, 2005 WL 0238998 (2005) (Eagan, J.)) are as follows:

BACKGROUND

At approximately 10:00 p.m. on February 1, 2003, the plaintiff, AJcides Mariano, was a patron…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hennessey v. HennesseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  2. Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. Esposito v. Hospital of St. RaphaelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. Miller v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Mariano v. Ohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API