Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided April 9, 1992No. IP 91-145-CR-01, IP 91-145-CR-02PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ENTRY DISCUSSING ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

TINDER, District Judge.

This cause comes before the Court on Defendants’ Gary D. Williams and Sheila J. Williams joint motion to compel discovery. On October 30, 1991, this Court entered a preliminary order providing for discovery pursuant to applicable rules, statutes, and law. Defendants now request this Court to order the Government to produce specific items to supplement that previous order. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Robert McPartlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Chimney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  2. United States v. James N. Barnes (93-6120) and Doyle R. Pate, Jr. (93-6149)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Tuesta ToroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. GiampaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  5. United States v. JacksonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API