Legal Opinion

Halder v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1954No. 32671PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

— Arthur Haider suffered a severe stroke on June 5, 1949. He claimed compensation under the workmen’s compensation act for the resulting temporary disability and medical expense. It was and is his position that the stroke was caused by injuries sustained in an industrial accident on May 28, 1949. The supervisor of industrial insurance rejected the claim upon the ground that Haider’s condition was not the result of the injury alleged.

The supervisor’s order was sustained by the board of industrial insurance appeals. Haider appealed to the superior court, where the case was tried before a jury.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ehman v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Tonkovich v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Petersen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Anton v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Boyer v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Intalco Aluminum Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. Arthurs v. National Postal Transport Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Woods v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Johnson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Venezelos v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API