State v. Rochester
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice;
Appellant Darryl Rochester was convicted for murder, kidnapping, and the malicious destruction of personal property. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of appellant on the criminal sexual conduct charge. Although the State sought the death penalty, appellant received a life sentence. Appellant argues the trial judge erred in admitting three statements made by him because they were induced by a promise of leniency. Additionally, he asserts that the last two of those statements were inadmissible because they were obtained after he had invoked his right to counsel.
I.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hutto v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. BlackburnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Tyler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- State v. DobySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. BlankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. Von DohlenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.