Legal Opinion

State v. Smiter

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 28, 2010No. 2010AP599-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrennan, J.

¶ 1. Tracy Smiter appeals from a judgment, entered after he pled guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. He argues, pursuant to Arizona v. Gant, _U.S. _, 129 S. Ct. 1710 (2009),1 that police officers illegally searched his vehicle after arresting him for possession of marijuana, and that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress the additional drugs discovered during the search. Because we conclude that the police officers "reasonably] . . . believe[d] the vehicle contained] evidence of the offense of arrest," that is, possession of marijuana, we affirm.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. v. KesslerColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State ex rel. Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
  3. State v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
  4. State v. GuardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
  5. State v. AnkerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API