Jones v. Sidle
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Rule on the plaintiff to show cause why he should not be restrained from proceeding under an execution, issued by the Commercial Court, Watts, J. cited the Code of Practice, art. 573. 6 Mart. N. S. 598. 8 lb. 393. 6 La. 228. 10 lb. 271.
1Opinion of the CourtBullard, J.
The plaintiff having obtained judgment against the two defendants jointly, they took what they considered a suspensive appeal, returnable on the first Monday in April, 1843, and *60which has been returned accordingly, and is now pending in this court. The plaintiff, after the a'ppeal was allowed, and the bond given, took a rule upon one of the defendants, Stewart, to show cause why execution should not be issued, ás to him, on the ground that he had filed no appeal bond, as required by law, and in accordance with the judgment rendered' against him. This rule was made absolute, and the execution…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hiligsberg v. New-Orleans Canal & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
3Cited by1 opinion
- The Frances, Boyer, Master. ( Thompson and Al. .)Supreme Court of the United States · 1814