Legal Opinion

United States Trust Co. v. Greiner

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tierney, J.:

The action against the defendant A. B. Leach & Company, Inc., is for an accounting of property that was held by the defendant Greiner in a fiduciary relationship for the plaintiff’s testator, as his agent, and transferred to A. B. Leach & Company, Inc., in disregard of the agent’s duty. That defendant sets up a defense that the plaintiff has a sufficient remedy at law. That is a good defense to an action in equity unless the cause is one of which both law and equity have concurrent jurisdiction and the plaintiff may ■elect in which tribunal to prosecute his claim. I think that is…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sisson v. HassettNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Brozan v. WormsNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  3. 276 Spring Street Corp. v. ForbesNew York Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Eldredge v. EldredgeNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API