Legal Opinion

Big Butte Ranch, Inc. v. Holm

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1977No. 14630PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Appeal from the decision of the district court which determined all of the provisions of a contract to have been terminated and of no force and effect.

The parties hereto entered into a Uniform Real Estate Contract on April 1,1969, for the purchase of an Idaho farm and under the terms of which the buyers were to supply beef, lamb, potatoes, honey, and wheat from the farm operations to the seller for a period of 25 years. The buyers lived on and worked the farm for some three years before they defaulted. Subsequently, the parties entered into a Termination Agreement prepared by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mathis v. MadsenUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Corporation Nine v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Barber v. CalderUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Benson v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Cook v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Atlas Corp. v. Clovis National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Buehner Block Co. v. UWC ASSOCIATESUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Faulkner v. FarnsworthUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Bekins Bar v. Ranch v. HuthUtah Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API