Legal Opinion

Bilger v. Maritime Overseas Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 4, 1969No. 47450PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

TUTTLE, District Judge.

This is a seaman’s action for damages for personal injury. Jurisdiction is in admiralty and recovery is claimed under the Jones Act and under provisions of general maritime law.

The following facts numbered 1 are either agreed upon between the parties or are not in dispute. Other facts will be found by the Court based upon its resolution of conflicting or disputed testimony. Such findings will be numbered 2 et seq.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The plaintiff was employed by defendant’s vessel S. S. OVERSEAS DIN-NY as chief electrician. At the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ruffiner v. Material Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. William Bilger v. Maritime Overseas Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. Sherfy v. BARGE MARIN HORIZON, NO. 651632District Court, N.D. California · 1999
  4. Clifton v. Voyager Inc.High Court of American Samoa · 1996
  5. Ruffiner v. Material Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API