McIntosh Road Materials Co. v. Woolworth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Drew:
While I concur with the majority in holding that the attempt to award contracts on March 29, 1950, was a *216nullity, I must dissent from the view that binding contracts were entered into with appellant companies on March 2,1950, for the reason that it completely ignores the plain mandates of the statute governing the purchase of materials for state use. The record here before us conclusively shows that the provisions of the applicable statute were not fully complied with, and therefore, no contracts came into being between the Commonwealth and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Neely v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Carpenter v. Yeadon BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- New York & New England Railroad v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
- Hill v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.