Claim of Andrus v. Purolator Products
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 25, 2001, which ruled that the employer’s workers’ compensation carrier was responsible for the payment of workers’ compensation benefits.
On February 9, 1993, claimant sustained an injury to her left shoulder in the course of her employment. The employer’s workers’ compensation carrier thereafter accepted a conciliation agreement providing that claimant’s injury was compensable, that symptomatic treatment was authorized and that claimant had accrued no compensable lost time. Pursuant to the decision of a Workers’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Casey v. Hinkle Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Claim of Scalesse v. Printing Advertising Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Claim of Becker v. Marcy State HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Claim of McGarry v. Capatano & Grow Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Claim of McQueen v. New York State Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Claim of Bates v. Finger Lakes Truck RentalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Claim of Carubia v. Colt IndustriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of Jones v. HSBCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Buffum v. Syracuse UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of Hantz v. Brightman AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.