Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Boles

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 14, 1998No. 1970297PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

720 So.2d 911 (1998)

Ex parte Donald Neil BOLES.

(Re Donald Neil BOLES v. John Earl KELLEY and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company).

1970297.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 14, 1998.

Daine Sharpe of Sharpe & Reynolds, Dadeville, for petitioner.

William A. Austill and Conley W. Knott of Maddox, Austill & Parmer, P.C., Birmingham, for respondent John Earl Kelley.

COOK, Justice.

Donald Neil Boles petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the Tallapoosa Circuit Court to vacate its order transferring Boles's lawsuit against John Earl Kelley and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte EdgarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Lowe v. Nationwide Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Ex Parte First Family Financial ServicesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Elmore County Com'n v. RagonaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Alabama Youth Services Bd. v. EllisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Kult v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Moore v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API