Legal Opinion
Weber v. Sanborn
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 22, 2007No. Civil Action 06-10125-JLAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
(Docket # 60)
ALEXANDER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c), Defendants 1 (“PL & P”) move for judgment on the pleadings on Count IX of the Complaint, Violation of Chapter 93A. PL & P avers that Plaintiff, Drew Weber (“Plaintiff’), has not alleged, and cannot prove, that the acts or omissions in Count IX occurred “primarily and substantially” in Massachusetts as required under M.G.L., c. 93A, § 11. PL & P avers that the information in Count IX relates solely to alleged activities that took place in the state of New…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Kuwaiti Danish Computer Co. v. Digital Equipment Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Kenda Corp. v. Pot O'Gold Money Leagues, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Collier v. City of ChicopeeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Vickery v. JonesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1995
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weber v. SanbornDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- American International Group, Inc. v. Ace Ina Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Ashwood Computer Co., Inc. v. Zumasys, IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024