Legal Opinion

CNA Insurance Companies, Inc. v. Semedo-Anacleto

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 25, 1995No. 94-P-416PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff (CNA) on its complaint seeking reimbursment for the workers’ compensation benefits that it paid to the defendant Semedo-Anacleto, who was seriously injured in the course of her employment and who thereafter entered into a settlement agreement with the Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund (Fund) and the insured of the insolvent insurer. Because G. L. c. 175D precludes reimburse*272ment by the contributors to the amount settled upon Semedo-Anacleto, that is, by the Fund and the insured of the insolvent insurer, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ferrari v. TotoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Ferrari v. TotoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  3. McDonald v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Gaeta v. National Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Percoco's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dufresne's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  2. Ellis v. Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency FundMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008
  3. Massachusetts Care Self-Insurance Group, Inc. v. Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency FundMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API