Reilly v. City of Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF COURT
2Per curiam
The Court accepts plenary jurisdiction, 42 Pa.C.S. § 726, and dismisses the Complaints. The language of the statute clearly demonstrates that the legislative intent in the original Home Rule Charter and Optional Plans Law, Act of April 13, 1972, No. 62, § 101, 53 P.S. § 1-101 et seq., was to grant the local communities, except as specifically prohibit*167ed in § l-302(a)(7), the right to fix rates, but not subjects, of taxation.
NIX, C.J., and McDERMOTT, J., dissent, would not accept plenary jurisdiction, and would remand the case to proceed to a determination on the merits.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cox's v. Municipality of MonroevilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Penn Hills School District v. Municipality of Penn HillsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989