Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Florida Coast Bank of Pompano Beach v. Kimmitt

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 8, 1983No. 79-1760Published

1ConcurrenceHurley, Judge

There is a procedural aspect to this case which, I think, merits further discussion. It involves the legal effect of a “premature” motion for new trial or rehearing. (By “premature” I mean a motion for new trial or rehearing which is filed before the rendition of a verdict in a jury action or the entry of judgment in a non-jury action. See Rule 1.530(b), Fla.R.Civ.P.) Two of our decisions: Karl A. Kandell Associates *136v. Urbanek, 391 So.2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), and Tri-State Systems, Inc. v. Seminole County, 302 So.2d 168 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), suggest that such a premature motion is a nullity…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  2. Director of Revenue, State of Colorado v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  3. Casto v. CastoSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. WBD, INC. v. Howard Johnson Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API