Legal Opinion

Reed v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The misbehavior report and the testimony of its author at the Tier III hearing constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination that petitioner violated inmate rules 104.13 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [5] [iv]) and 106.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [7] [i]) (see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 139). Respondent concedes, however, that the determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 107.11 (7…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Rowe v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Elliott v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API