Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Donahue-Stratton Co. v. Grimm
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
If there was more than one county which was a proper county for the trial of the action, then the demand of the relator for a change of venue is insufficient and the writ must be denied. Anderson v. Arpin H. L. Co. 131 Wis. 34, 110 N. W. 788. See, also, State ex rel. Bessie v. Halsey, 148 Wis. 171, 134 N. W. 362; State ex rel. Wis. D. M. Co. v. Circuit Court, 176 Wis. 198, 186 N. W. 732.
The action was property triable in the county in which the relator had its principal office and place of business or in which the cause of action or some part thereof arose. Sub. 6, sec. 2619, Stats. It is the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hibernia National Bank v. . LacombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Dry Milk Co. v. Circuit CourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Anderson v. Arpin Hardwood Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. News Publishing Co. v. ParkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Werner v. I.C.R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1942
- Werner v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
- State ex rel. Webster Manufacturing Co. v. RisjordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. Connor Lumber & Land Co. v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Scaramelli & Co. v. Courteen Seed Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.