Legal Opinion

Butzer v. Johns

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1979No. 1613PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, J.

Defendants-appellants, Jerry and Joann Johns, were enjoined from obstructing a vacated alley which led to a garage owned by plaintiffs-appellees, Darles L. and Joyce Butzer. Upon appeal, we affirm the trial court’s decision.

Facts.

The Butzers own lot Nos. 63 and 64 in the village of Marshallville; the Johnses own lot No. 62. The lots front on Main Street. The Johnses’ lot also abuts Euclid Street. The 120 by 15 foot alley, which is the focus of the dispute in this case, runs southerly off Euclid Street. It passes'through the back of the Johnses’ lot (lot No. 62) and then through the back of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. CarpenterOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Paul v. Wissalohican Camp Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Ording v. SalingerMiami County Court of Common Pleas · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sherck v. BremkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Bremke v. SherckOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API