Legal Opinion
Oxford v. United States
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 27, 1991No. CIV 87-1845 PHX EHCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1232ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS AND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CARROLL, District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. This is a personal injury action instituted by the plaintiffs against the United States under authority of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671, et seq. and 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). Subsequent to the filing of plaintiffs’ complaint, the defendant, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 14, brought a complaint against plaintiffs’ employer, Jesse Craig, Inc., seeking indemnity for the negligence of the employer.
2. The plaintiffs were injured on the job when a ladder on which they…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Holloman v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Delora Huff Page, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of Stanley James Pageand Jenny Lynn Page, MinorsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Welker v. Kennecott Copper CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Martha M. Kirk, an Adult, and Kenneth William Kirk, a Minor, Who Sues by His Guardian Ad Litem, Martha M. Kirk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Roberson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rause v. Paperchine, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- Jamel Kasim v. United States of America Republic Management Services, Inc., a Texas Corporation, - Jamel Kasim v. United States of America and Republic Management Services, Inc., a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998