Legal Opinion
Bado Realty Co. v. Oetjen
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1957PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobert Doscher, J.
This is an action for a judgment directing the defendant to specifically perform an agreement to sell and convey certain real property located in the town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County. It is plaintiff’s position inter alia that it duly exercised an option granted to it, thereby ripening said option into a contract. Defendant, on the other hand, claims that the option was an integral and indivisible part of a lease between the parties and that, the lease being terminated before the exercise of the option because of the “ fire clause ” (to be discussed hereinafter) the option ceased and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- M. O'Neil Supply Co. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Matter of City of New York (Upper N.Y. Bay)New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Madawick Contracting Co. v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- R. I. Realty Co. v. TerrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Gilbert v. Van KleeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- First National City Bank v. Frederics-Helton Travel Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Jacobs v. Alrae Hotel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Adams Drug Co. v. KnobelNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hutt v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Sabre Realty Management Corp. v. VitaleCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.