Legal Opinion

Town of Duxbury v. Town of Williamstown

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 8, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover for care and support of a poor person for which it claims defendant is liable. The case was tried by the Montpelier city court. After a full hearing on the merits and judgment had been entered for the defendant, plaintiff moved to strike off the judgment and dismiss the case on the ground that the court did not have jurisdiction of the cause, the process, or the parties. The motion was granted, and the defendant excepted. .

The court found the facts upon which the motion was predicated to be as follows: The writ, which demanded damages in the sum of forty…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sentenis v. . LadewNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Andrew v. AndrewSupreme Court of Vermont · 1889
  3. Huntley v. HenrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
  4. Wade v. Wade's Admr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  5. Clough v. IdeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howe v. Lisbon Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  2. Howe v. Lisbon Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API