Sexual Minorities Uganda v. Lively
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal reminds us that federal courts of appeals have no roving writ to review either a district court's word choices or its run-of-the-mill interlocutory orders. Given these limitations, we are left with two questions, the first of which can be resolved through principles of judicial estoppel and the second of which can be resolved through a recognition of the district court's broad discretion with respect to supplemental jurisdiction. When all is said and done, we dismiss some portions of this appeal for want of appellate jurisdiction and otherwise affirm the…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Lambert v. FiorentiniCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Abbo-Bradley v. City of Niagara FallsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Behrens v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- 3137, LLC v. Town of HarwichCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025
- Hisert v. HaschenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.