United States v. One Buick Sedan
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRONER, Associate Justice.
The question we have to decide is whether an automobile seized by prohibition agents, but where no arrest of the driver can be made, may be forfeited under section 3450, Revised Statutes (26 USCA § 1181), if it was being used for the purpose of transporting and concealing intoxicating liquors on which the tax is due and unpaid. The facts are these:
Prohibition agents, stationed at a point near the District line, observed an automobile approaching at a high rate of speed. They followed but lost sight of the car in a bend of the road. Later they discovered it standing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. YuginovichSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Richbourg Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Port Gardner Investment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Southern Agency Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. One 1931 Ford Sedan AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1932
- United States v. One Ford Coupe, 1929 Model, Engine No. A1401643District Court, D. Wyoming · 1932