Legal Opinion
Chance v. Kitchell
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1983No. 14263PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RIORDAN, Justice.
On November 17, 1981, Shirley Chance and Lee Roy Kitchell (Plaintiffs) brought an action for partition of property owned by their father who died intestate on October 5,1969. Hazel D. Kitchell (Defendant), wife of decedent and stepmother of Plaintiffs, counterclaimed for monies expended on behalf of the property. The case was tried without a jury on stipulated facts. The trial court ordered partition of the property and found that “nothing [else] should be due by either party to the other”. Defendant appeals. We affirm.
The issues on appeal are:
I. Whether the trial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Marriage of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Hanrahan v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Williams v. Sinclair Refining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
- Hunter v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Portillo v. ShappieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mitchell v. MitchellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Leckie v. LeckieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re CzerneskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
- Dorbin v. DorbinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Mendoza v. MendozaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.