Legal Opinion

Weighmann v. Sire

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from circuit court, Queens county. Action by Louis P. Weighmann against Benjamin Sire and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, entered on the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The record shows nothing but a question of fact. The complaint is based upon facts which show that one Catharine H. Mitnacht rendered services and furnished material on three separate premises for the defendant. The complaint claims $1,146 for one contract, $75 for another, and $55 for the third. The answer states that the contract for which $1,146 is claimed was for $960, which was paid; that the contractor failed to execute the $55 contract. The $75 contract is denied. The plaintiff is the owner of the several claims by assignment from Catharine H. Mitnacht. The parties differed…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Teeter v. TeeterNew York Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API