Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1958No. Crim. 3391PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ST. CLAIR, J. pro tem. *

Defendant was charged in an information with three violations of Penal Code, section 476a, drawing and uttering checks in the amount of $20, $20, and $12.50, knowing that he had insufficient funds for the payment of the checks upon their presentation. After first pleading not guilty to all three counts, defendant withdrew this plea and pleaded guilty to the three counts. Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on the guilty pleas.

Counsel has been appointed for this appeal whose sole contention is that the face of the record shows that defendant was represented by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. In Re JinglesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. People v. LennoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mills v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. CeballosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. HolzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. People v. OvertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. GutkowskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API