State v. Bristol Hotel Asset Co.
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Baker
The Court states that we granted “the State’s petition to determine the requirements for proof of notice in a condemnation proceeding.” What the Court should have said is that the Court granted the State’s petition to change over one-hundred years of condemnation law about the requirements the State must meet to prove service of the commissioners’ hearing notice and thus jurisdiction in a condemnation proceeding. The $94,000 dollar question is: Why?
⅜ ⅛ ⅜ ¾: ⅜ ⅜
This condemnation case involves whether the trial court correctly granted the landowner’s plea to the jurisdiction on the ground that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Primate Construction, Inc. v. SilverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.