Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Bristol Hotel Asset Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2002No. 00-1146Published

1DissentJustice Baker

The Court states that we granted “the State’s petition to determine the requirements for proof of notice in a condemnation proceeding.” What the Court should have said is that the Court granted the State’s petition to change over one-hundred years of condemnation law about the requirements the State must meet to prove service of the commissioners’ hearing notice and thus jurisdiction in a condemnation proceeding. The $94,000 dollar question is: Why?

⅜ ⅛ ⅜ ¾: ⅜ ⅜

This condemnation case involves whether the trial court correctly granted the landowner’s plea to the jurisdiction on the ground that…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Primate Construction, Inc. v. SilverTexas Supreme Court · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API