Ouachita National Bank in Monroe v. Williamson
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MARVIN, Judge.
The plaintiff bank sued Williamson on a promissory note. Williamson, as third-party plaintiff, sued Southern as third-party defendant on Southern’s written assumption of the note. The bank was awarded judgment on the main demand against Williamson. Williamson was awarded judgment on the third-party demand against Southern. Southern appeals. We affirm.
Williamson and Southern were engaged with others, as a corporation in utility con*173struction business under the name of Southern and Williamson Construction Company, Inc. The corporation was not making a profit when the transaction at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cox v. WM Heroman & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Paxton v. BallardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Davis v. WelchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Young v. WarnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Bank of Coushatta v. CoatsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Scott v. Bank of CoushattaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Lawrence v. Terral Seed, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Adams v. AdamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Causeway Equipment, Inc. v. BellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Dunaway v. SpainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.