Legal Opinion

Ouachita National Bank in Monroe v. Williamson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1976No. 13011PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARVIN, Judge.

The plaintiff bank sued Williamson on a promissory note. Williamson, as third-party plaintiff, sued Southern as third-party defendant on Southern’s written assumption of the note. The bank was awarded judgment on the main demand against Williamson. Williamson was awarded judgment on the third-party demand against Southern. Southern appeals. We affirm.

Williamson and Southern were engaged with others, as a corporation in utility con*173struction business under the name of Southern and Williamson Construction Company, Inc. The corporation was not making a profit when the transaction at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cox v. WM Heroman & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  2. Paxton v. BallardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  3. Davis v. WelchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  4. Young v. WarnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Bank of Coushatta v. CoatsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Scott v. Bank of CoushattaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. Lawrence v. Terral Seed, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Adams v. AdamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Causeway Equipment, Inc. v. BellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Dunaway v. SpainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API