Legal Opinion
Querrey & Harrow, Ltd. v. Transcontinental Insurance Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 19, 2007No. 45A03-0601-CV-36PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOFFMAN, Senior Judge.
Defendants-Appellants Querrey & Harrow, Ltd. (“the Querrey firm”); James N. Kosmond (“Kosmond”); Gretchen Cepek (“Cepek”); Sanders Pianowski, LLP (“the Sanders firm”); and Robert A. Sanders, individually (“Sanders”) appeal the trial court’s denial of their respective motions for summary judgment in a suit filed by Plaintiff-Appellee Transcontinental Insurance Company (“CNA”). Both the Sanders firm and the Querrey firm were hired to represent Jumpking in a product liability action filed in the Elkhart Circuit Court (“the underlying litigation”). In the instant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- American Centennial Insurance Co. v. Canal Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Estate of Heck Ex Rel. Heck v. StofferIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Walker v. LawsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- American Employers' Insurance v. Medical Protective Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Thomas Rosenbaum v. Beau WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. WeissColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Querrey & Harrow, Ltd. v. Transcontinental Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Terry Krukemyer v. James ForcumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Sentry Select Ins. Co. v. Maybank Law Firm, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.