Commonwealth v. Newman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY BENDER, J.:
The Commonwealth appeals from the order of the trial court granting Appellee’s suppression motion and denying the Commonwealth’s motion for reconsideration of the same. After careful review, we affirm.
The trial court summarized the facts adduced at the suppression hearing as follows:
The facts of this case were long and drawn out as it involved police surveillance of numerous drug transactions in a known drug area over an hour and a half time period prior to the [AppelleeJ’s arrival at the scene. The testifying officers admitted that [Appellee] was not observed in any of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Com. v. Fulton, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
- Com. v. Almanzar, Y.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Anthony, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Com. v. Bussey, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Com. v. Edmonds, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.