Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Purity Paint Products Corp. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 18, 1944No. Civil Action 1001PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, District Judge.

The Heard Act was enacted in 1894, 28 Stat. 278, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270. It provided that every formal contract for the construction of a public building should be supported by a single bond conditioned upon due performance and upon prompt payment by the contractor or contractors of “all persons supplying him or them with labor and materials in the prosecution of the work provided for” in such contract. The Act, however, contained no other language (than that just quoted) to indicate whether liability under the bond should attach when material was “furnished” by delivery at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States of America for the Use and Benefit of J. P. Byrne & Co., Inc. v. Fire Association of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. United States v. Avanti Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. United States for Use of Crane CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. United States Ex Rel. Color Craft Corp. v. DicksteinDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1957
  5. United States Ex Rel. Gamerston & Green Lumber Co. v. Phœnix Assurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API