Legal Opinion

Lumbermens' Mutual Casualty Co. v. Yeroyan

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 4, 1939No. 3034PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The obligation of the plaintiff as stated in the body of the policy is, so far as here material, to pay all sums which the assured shall become obligated to pay by reason of the liability imposed upon him by law for damages accidentally suffered by any person on account of bodily injuries, “including loss of services in consequence of such injuries.” The obligation prescribed by Laws 1927, c. 54, is substantially identical with this policy-provision, since the preposition “for” in the phrase “liability to pay damages to others for damage to property . . . and/or bodily injuries” (Laws 1927,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Cormier v. HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Bruyette v. SandiniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bilodeau v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. American Home Assurance Co. v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Co., American Home Assurance Co. v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  3. Greenwood Cemetery, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Duncan v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  5. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Florida · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API