Shandrow v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was brought by George A. Shandrow and Flossie Shandrow, his wife, to recover damages for personal injuries to Mrs. Shandrow, claimed to be due to negligence which was chargeable to the defendant, the city of Tacoma. The cause was tried to a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendant. The plaintiffs moved for a new trial, which motion was overruled, and from the judgment entered dismissing the action they appeal.
The cause was here upon a prior appeal, 188 Wash. 389, 62 P. (2d) 1090, which was from the first trial of the action. In that action, the trial court, at the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hogan v. Metropolitan Building Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- Blystone v. Walla Walla Valley Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Sproul v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Shandrow v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- Keen v. O'ROURKEWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Moore v. KeeseyWashington Supreme Court · 1946