Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Roberts

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 4, 2015No. 2140426PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Judge.

Guardians ad litem appointed to represent the interests of minor children in domestic-relations cases are entitled to receive reasonable fees for them services. See § 26-2A-52, Ala.Code 1975, and Rule 17, Ala. R. Civ. P. This appeal raises the questions whether the Jefferson Circuit Court (“the trial court”) awarded an unreasonable fee to a guardian ad litem appointed to represent the interests of a child in a divorce case, whether the trial court erred in determining that the guardian ad litem’s fee in such a case is hot limited to the rate specified in § 15-12-21, Ala.Code…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. American Civil Liberties Union v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Tuscaloosa County Com'n v. Deputy SheriffsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Peebles v. MileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. T.C.M. v. W.L.K.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  2. Turner v. TurnerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  3. Thomson v. ShepardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API