Legal Opinion

Houck v. Hult

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1932No. File No. 6801PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

In 1920, the defendant Anderson agreed to purchase from the defendant Hult certain lands in Clay county. On March 1, 1921, the sale was consummated, and at that time Anderson gave to Hult two notes in the sum of $5,000 each, and secured the same by a mortgage on the Clay county land. One of the notes was due March 1, 1922, and the other was due March 1, 1923. Subsequent to the Anderson-Hult transaction, Hult made a contract with the plaintiff for the purchase of certain land in Potter county, S. D. In. this contract it was provided that the two notes, which Anderson had given to Hult in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Houck v. HultSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  2. McVay v. TousleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Calkins v. First National Bank of Custer CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Houck v. HultSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Allen v. McLainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. JH LARSON ELECTRICAL COMPANY v. Vander VorsteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Johnson v. OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Reinschmidt v. HirschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API