Legal Opinion

State of Missouri v. Ardell Fields

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 2016No. ED103288PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLisa P. Page, Judge

Ardell Fields (“Movant”) is incarcerated for a rape he claims he did not commit. In his quest to be exonerated, Movant pursues post-conviction DNA testing, pursuant to Section 547.035. 1 Movant appeals from the motion court’s judgment, after an evidentiary hearing, denying his post-conviction motion for DNA testing. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

In April 1996, Movant was convicted, after a jury trial in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, of forcible rape, resisting arrest, and third degree assault. Movant was sentenced to a term of life imprisonment for the forcible rape conviction, a term of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Weeks v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  2. Louis Edward Mallow v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. State v. RuffSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  4. State v. KinderMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Hudson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HaynesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State v. CoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Robert Wayne, Plaintiff/Appellant, vs. The Washington University d/b/a Washington University, Defendant/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. State of Missouri v. Fred L. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State of Missouri v. John W. CaudillMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API