Legal Opinion

B. R. Davis & Bro. v. Herman Schaffner & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 27, 1893No. 141PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

The demurrer to the plea in abatement of Mrs. Davis, alleging nonjoinder of the representatives of J. P. Davis, was properly sustained. They had been partners, and the suit was originally brought against the partnership upon a debt of the firm, and service was had upon J. P. Davis. He died pending suit, and his death was suggested of record, and plaintiffs by supplemental petition procured service to be made upon Mrs. Davis, the other partner. She pleaded in abatement that the heirs of J. P. Davis should be made parties. Judgment was not sought against them, nor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arthur v. BatteTexas Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shivel Stewart v. Greer Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Eastland County v. DavissonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Robson v. DailyArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Sederholm v. City of Port ArthurCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. City of San Antonio v. Guadalupe-Blanco River AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API