Haft-Gaines Co. v. Reddick
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LETTS, Judge.
The Writ of Prohibition is Granted.
The facts are that the plaintiff and the defendant entered into an out of court settlement of this cause confirmed by letter.1 In accordance with this settlement, attorneys for both sides executed and entered into a “Stipulation for Dismissal” filed with the court which read in toto:
COME NOW the parties Steve Weil and Haft-Gaines Company by and through their undersigned attorneys and stipulate that this action may be dismissed in accordance with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420 with prejudice to both parties.
The disputed letter of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shelby Mutual Ins. Co. of Shelby, Ohio v. PearsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Cannon Sand & Rock, Inc. v. Maule Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kight v. Capeletti BrothersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Miraglia v. GeigerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Carnathan v. Farm Bureau InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986