Legal Opinion

West River Bank v. Taylor

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1865PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavies, J.

The facts found by the referee who tried this action, material to the question presented for decision, are, that the bill of exchange set out in the complaint, and upon which the action is brought, was accepted by the drawee in the city of ISTew York, and there indorsed by the defendant Taylor, without consideration, and for the accommodation of the drawer thereof; that said bill was dated at'Windsor, Vermont, and, after the same was so accepted by the defendant St. John, and indorsed by the defendant Taylor, was, soon after such indorsement and acceptance, and before the same became due,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bank of Utica v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1820
  2. Colt v. NobleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  3. Mead v. EngsNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  4. Ogden v. DobbinThe Superior Court of New York City · 1829
  5. Spencer v. . BallouNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Griffith v. AssmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  2. Bank of the United States v. LunenfeldNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Big Sandy National Bank v. ChiltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Big Sandy National Bank v. ChiltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Cronkhite v. CronkhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API