Legal Opinion
Siebrand v. Eyerly Aircraft Company
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 16, 1961No. Civ. 60-27PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
This is an action in which plaintiffs’ claim the right to be indemnified by defendant against the effect of certain judgments entered in the United States District Court for the District of Montana.
I have heretofore made and filed preliminary findings of fact.
Plaintiffs are engaged in the business, of operating a circus and carnival which, includes furnishing for compensation-rides on various machines and devices used for amusement purposes. Defendant is engaged in the business of manufacturing, overhauling, renovating and repairing amusement rides and devices for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Crawford v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. Lucibello v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Booth-Kelly Lumber Co. v. Southern Pacific Co. Southern Pacific Co. v. Booth-Kelly Lumber CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Astoria v. Astoria & Columbia River R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marwell Construction, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Philadelphia Ship Maintenance Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Essex Wire Corp. of California v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- District of Columbia v. C. F. & B., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1977
- Ambrose v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.