Legal Opinion

State v. Demery

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 14, 2000No. 23779-2-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

— Kenneth Demery appeals convictions of robbery and kidnapping, alleging, among other things, that the trial court committed prejudicial error when it allowed the State to play his taped interview to the jury without redacting accusatory statements made by the interviewing officer. The officer told Demery that his story “doesn’t make sense” and he needs to “start tellin’ the truth”; the officer also said that Demery was lying. We conclude that these remarks constituted improper and prejudicial comments on Demery’s credibility and guilt. Because the error was not harmless, we reverse and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NotaroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. State v. NotaroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API