Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Mills

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 24, 1904No. 2876PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From Van Zandt County. Original application for habeas corpus for release from an arrest for violating the local option law. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Applicant was arrested for violating the local option law, and resorted to the writ of habeas corpus. The election putting the local option law into effect was held in a portion of the county, composed of all the justice precincts except No. 2. Some of the territory included was already under operation of the local option law. Of the questions presented, we desire to discuss but one, to wit, the authority of the commissioners court to combine justice precincts, or other subdivisions of a county, for the purpose of holding local option elections. We have answered this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HeymanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  2. Ex Parte FieldsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Ex Parte RippyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Griffin v. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ex Parte MeyerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Patton v. Texas Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Griffin v. Tucker, County AttorneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API