Ricardo S. v. Carron C.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
A sound and substantial basis in the record supports the determination that it is in the child’s best interests to remain in the custody of his father (see Lubit v Lubit, 65 AD3d 954, 955 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 716 [2010], cert denied 560 US —, 130 S Ct 3362 [2010]). The court reached this determination after a full evidentiary hearing at which it had the opportunity to hear the testimony of the witnesses, including both parents, and interview the child in camera (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171-172 [1982]; Matter of Nelissa O. v Danny C., 70 AD3d 572 [2010]).
The record indicates…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Nelissa O. v. Danny C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by7 opinions
- David H. v. Khalima H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- David H. v. Khalima H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of F.Z. v. J.R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
- Matter of Frances M.L. v. Luis F.O.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Matter of Leonidez A. v. Sira L.R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.