Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between County of Schenectady & Lainhart
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 21, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Doran, J.), entered May 15, 1990 in Schenectady County, which, inter alia, granted petitioners’ application pursuant to CPLR 7503 to stay arbitration between the parties.
Respondent Paul Lainhart was hired by petitioners as a correction officer at the Schenectady County Jail on October 27, 1988, subject to a one-year probationary term. In August 1989, Lainhart was fired for an alleged rules violation but subsequently reinstated after he protested the employer’s action. On October 18, 1989, Lainhart was again notified of his termination, effective…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In the Arbitration between Franklin Central School & Franklin Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Baker v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re the Arbitration Between Board of Trustees & Maplewood Teachers' Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- Edelman v. IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Baker v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- County of Cattaraugus v. NussNew York Supreme Court · 2008
- In re the Arbitration between County of Columbia & Columbia County Deputy Sheriff's Benevolent Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992