Legal Opinion
Seneca Falls Machine Co. v. McBeth
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 26, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 64-526PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
This action, tried non-jury, involves a claim and counterclaims.
It appears in the Complaint and is admitted in the Answer that the plaintiff, Seneca Falls Machine Company (Seneca), agreed orally with the defendant partnership, McBeth Machinery Company (McBeth), whereby the latter was to act as the former’s sales representative for its electronics division. It was also alleged and admitted that on or about October 20, 1961, Seneca sold to McBeth an electronic tractor (tracer) for $14,846.00, for delivery to the actual customer, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, at Derry,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Glazer v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Daset Mining Corp. v. Industrial Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Seneca Falls MacHine Company v. Paul C. McBeth and Paul C. McBeth Jr., Individually, and T/a McBeth MacHinery CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Ab Iro v. Otex, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1983