Kobluk v. University of Minnesota

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant contends that the trial court erroneously interpreted the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act when it found that respondent employer was not required to give appellant employee a Ten-nessen warning before it interviewed him regarding incidents within the course and scope of his employment. Because the information he provided was not private or confidential data, we affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Dr. Calvin Kobluk was employed by respondent University of Minnesota (the university) as an assistant professor in the College of Veterinary Medicine. Appellant applied for…