Harshman v. Harshman

[¶1] Edward J. Harshman appeals from post-judgment orders entered in the District Court (Rockland) finding him in contempt. Harshman, the beneficiary of a substantial trust, had been ordered to maintain $ 500,000 in life insurance to benefit his ex-wife and their children, to whom he was required to pay significant spousal and child support. Not only did he fail to obtain the $ 500,000 policy, he allowed a $ 300,000 policy to lapse, claiming that when the court told him it was not enough, he was no longer required to maintain that policy; a claim that defies logic. We affirm the judgment of…