Legal Opinion

Christiansen v. Reading Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 17, 1940No. A-15892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

The libellant.has excepted to interrogatories “1” to “4”, inclusive, propounded by the claimant upon the ground that they are not directed to the subject upon which the claimant has the affirmative burden. Interrogatories “1”, “2”, “3” and “4” read as follows:

“1. State when and. where the barge ‘Christina’ was built.
“2. (a) State the dimensions of the barge ‘Christina’;
“(b) Her draft, loaded, on the occasion described in the Libel.
“3. Has the barge ‘Christina’ had any repairs made to her during five years prior to the accident alleged in the Libel.
“4. If your answer…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. American S.S. Co. v. Buckeye S.S. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1941
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. The VeloxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  3. The Poling Bros. No. 6District Court, E.D. New York · 1942
  4. Cargo Carriers, Inc. v. The ProspectDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1942
  5. Citro Chemical Co. of America v. Bank Line Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API